Nearer to Virtual Reality: Extraterrestrials and the Simulation Hypothesis

I believe that the Simulation Hypothesis – the hypothesis that we ‘live’ as virtual beings inside a simulated landscape inside a computer – is the most probable hypothesis when it comes to choosing between differing likelihood of reality. However , the key word centers around what I “believe”. I cannot demonstrate that the Simulation Hypothesis is the be-all-and-end-all of our reality – not however at least though I’m working on that will. Thus, I must keep an open thoughts to the possibility that our reality basically virtual but really real. Meanwhile my pontificating on the aliens-are-here, the particular UFO extraterrestrial hypothesis and related, is to be examined here in that virtuelle realität scenario.

# Virtual Aliens: When the Simulation Hypothesis is correct, exactly what would it mean for aliens to become here? It would mean no more with no less than what would it mean for a simulated couch to be in your simulated living room or a simulated tree in your simulated front yard or a simulated crook to pickpocket your simulated pocket. You’re asking a question about the motivation of whoever programmed into the simulated landscape the this, as well as the that and the next thing too including the idea of simulated anomalous lights in the sky and simulated extraterrestrials having their evil way with a select few of all of us. I have no idea what their inspiration might be.

I suggest though that one has to perhaps look at things through the eyes of our very own simulated beings part-and-parcel of our simulated landscapes in our video gaming. What would these virtual beings that we have programmed think of all the bits-and-pieces that we have included in their virtual planet? Why is this guy shooting at me? Why is this monster lurking within the shadows? Why is this Little Eco-friendly Man abducting and raping my daughter? Do we not include aliens, and all manner of alien connections in our own video games? Have we not created video games that revolve around “Star Trek” and “Star Wars” and their associated extraterrestrials? So , if we do it, what’s the matter with what someone (or something) may include in the programming of our simulation and simulated landscape?

Okay, that is hardly a question that discounts the presence of aliens in the here and now about what you would call our really real reality.

# The Supreme Developer: It could well be the fact that so far as our Supreme Programmer – the particular he / she / it / them responsible for creating our virtual reality – is concerned, we are just trivia. Issue Supreme Programmer has designed hundreds or thousands of simulated universes plus landscapes, then yes, we’re trivial. But then so to is any simulation or video game that we create. You purchase an off-the-shelf video game and isn’t really all of the contents really trivial? Yet back to simulated aliens.
If you have any inquiries regarding the place and how to use Singapore virtual reality content agency, you can speak to us at our own website.
Since we now have programmed hundreds of video games that feature aliens, and produced hundreds of movies and TV episodes (cinema getting just another form of simulation) that featured ET, some made even before the start of the modern UFO era, why should we (Royal We) and why should you (as in just you) raise eyebrows in the thought that our Supreme Programmer(s) featured aliens? Many forms of what goes by for entertainment is trivial. Our own science fiction novels and brief stories feature aliens by the bucketful who don’t “have to travel by means of space, time, space-time, or even a psychological space to get “here”. ” Properly actually they have to travel via a mental space – the author’s psychological space or the film producer’s mental space or the programmer’s mental room. So maybe we’re just entertainment for the Supreme Programmer, the “we’re” including aliens and UFOs all rounding out the Supreme Programmer’s cosmic landscape.

If we could speak with our video game or simulation character types (or characters written into a new or who appear on the silver screen) – and as you note, we can’t, yet – they may ask questions very similar to what must exist in the minds of readers right here about why we (the Regal We), their creators, programmed this particular or that or the next thing in creating their simulated landscape. We all (the Royal We) might respond that’s the way we desired it, even if it was trivial, or absurd.

I need point out when dealing with the Simulation Hypothesis that simply no free will exists. The figures in our novels have no free can; the characters in our films do not have free will; the characters in our video games have no free will. In case we’re the creation of a Great Programmer, we have no free may. We might have no free will when we boldly go, but as long as we think we have free will then we (Royal We) can be convinced of our boldly going prowess. That by the by could equally apply even if all of us exist in a really real fact.

But if anyone has digested something I’ve ever posted about the Simulation Hypothesis, they’d be aware there is a single vast difference between my postulated Supreme Programmer and a supernatural deity, or God if that word floats your boat. My postulated Supreme Programmer is a fallible SOB and ‘oops’ happen and absurdities happen. God, being omni this and omni that and omni the next matter wouldn’t create any oops or absurdities.

It is important to contrast a creation by a perfect being, an omni-God, whose creation logically would be ideal – no anomalies, no absurdities – and an imperfect becoming like a mortal flesh-and-blood computer programmer whose programming would not always be ideal and would probably contain anomalies plus absurdities. The proof of that pudding is it the constant updates and enhancements you get for your PC as well as the news stories that surface from time to time regarding security programming flaws in software program that allow the less than ethical in our midst to do relatively nasty things to the privacy, our bank accounts, our databases, our private and public organizations, like hacking into the NSA or the CIA, or having the NSA and the CIA hack into our Computers.

But by the by, if anyone would be to wish to call the Supreme Developer, the software/computer programmer responsible for our own Simulated (Virtual Reality) Universe “supernatural”, that’s fine by me as long as it’s not an omni-supernatural he / she or it / they. But exactly what this nitpicking actually contributes to the subject of E. T. and whether or not aliens are, or are not here, in our postulated virtual reality quite escapes me. I doubt if the readers here give a damn whether or not a computer developer can be defined as someone “supernatural”.

# The particular Twilight Zone: Whoever, whatever, programmed our cosmos and our local landscape had a sense of the outrageous. Perhaps that’s our Supreme Programmer’s sense of humour coming to the particular fore. What absurdities? Quantum physics is absurd. The fact that we cannot come up with a Theory of Everything is ludicrous. An accelerating expansion rate for the cosmos is absurd. Dark Power and Dark Matter are outrageous concepts. Crop circles are silly (but they’re here). The Grube Ness Monster is absurd (but people report seeing it or even them). Long Delayed Echoes are absurd (but verified). Transient Lunar Phenomena are absurd (but verified). Those Martian rock ‘anomalies’ such as lizards, rats and skulls are absurd (but they have been photographed). Biblical ‘miracles’ are absurd but millions believe they happened. The SETI “WOW” signal is an absurdity however it happened. There are all manner of archaeological absurdities, but I’ll mention just one – The Temple of Jupiter with Baalbek in modern day Lebanon. There are plenty of things that are absurd when it comes to the human species: here’s one – people are the only species where the stating “don’t shoot until you see the white wines of their eyes makes actual sense. If photons cannot escape from the Black Hole then neither can gravitons. Gravitons convey the gravitational force which means that Black Holes exert no gravity. A Black Opening without gravity is therefore a good absurdity. Then you have quasars that appear linked but have vastly differing red shifts which is also an absurdity. The missing satellite of Venus, Neith, is another absurdity as with how can satellites vanish? You have actual physical constants that apparently aren’t – constant that is. Time travel to days gone by is both theoretically possible (General Relativity) and theoretically impossible (paradoxes) – it’s an absurdity to get both something that can be and not end up being at the same time. Ghosts are absurd yet there are probably more sightings of ghosts going back to ancient times than there have been sightings of UFOs. Maybe UFOs, the “Greys” and associated are also absurdities, but they exist within good company with the rest of exactly what passes for our simulated cosmic ‘Twilight Zone’.

Here are a few more absurdities to ponder over. There are three decades of elementary particles, yet only one plays any significant role in the cosmos. The other two contribute absolutely nothing of substance and structure, so why is there a second and a third era of the elementary particles? In archaeology, the Mesoamerican Olmec massive multi-ton stone heads scream out ‘made in Africa’ or ‘we’re African’, yet there should not have been any kind of cross-cultural contact between Africa plus Central America way back in Olmec days. Such a scenario is considered an absurdity. Lastly, turning again to human anomalies, we on your own in all the animal kingdom have a bipedal gait without benefit of a balancing tail. A bipedal gait without any balancing mechanism makes us very unstable on our feet. We’re super easy to knock over. We can lose our balance, fall down and do yourself a mischief very easily relative to all of those other animal kingdom. That Mother Nature would select for such an absurdity, is, well, an absurdity.

Exceptions to the rule, like the human bipedal walking, require extra special scrutiny considering that at first glance lone exceptions appear extremely out-of-place and anomalous. Another illustration is with respect to velocity. Velocities can be added and subtracted with one exception – the speed associated with light. Why is this so? No one knows.

Now from the inside of the pc looking out, as virtual beings, we could never know for absolute certain that flaws or absurdities weren’t designed deliberately or built into the system. But that does not mean we (Royal We) can not damn well have suspicions, specially when the anomalies or the absurdities simply keep on mounting up. So there is no such thing, as some might suggest, of a proven ‘oops’, but right now there certainly can be suspicions that something happens to be screwy somewhere. There couldn’t logically be such suspicions if an omni-God (or equivalent) were the only option regarding our creation, something that was the case in ancient times before computer programming and software simulations has been conceived of in anyone’s viewpoint. An omni-God is no longer the only development scenario game in town.